This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Journal of Behavioral and Applied...
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Book Review
    • Case
    • General
    • Invited Paper
    • Letter from the Editor
    • Note
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:21113/feed
ISSN 1930-0158
General
Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2005September 01, 2005 EDT

The Effect of Peer Evaluations on Student Reports of Learning in a Team Environment: A Procedural Justice Perspective

Lynn Bowes-Sperry, Deborah L. Kidder, Sharon Foley,
procedural justicepeer evaluationstudents
https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.14566
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2005

Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2005
  • From the Editor
    John Humphreys
  • The Effect of Peer Evaluations on Student Reports of Learning in a Team Environment: A Procedural Justice Perspective
    Lynn Bowes-SperryDeborah L. KidderSharon Foley
  • A Multilevel Approach to Individual Readiness to Change
    David Desplaces
  • Enhancing the First-Year Experience for Business Students: Student Retention and Academic Success
    Pamela L. CoxElizabeth Dunne SchmittPaula E. BobrowskiGlenn Graham
  • Jet-A-Way Inc.: Winning Despite the Odds
    Bonita L. Betters-ReedLynda L. Moore
  • Does it Matter How We Get There (Really)? A Case of Ethics in Bidding
    Donald H. Schepers
Journal of Behavioral and Applied...
Bowes-Sperry, Lynn, Deborah L. Kidder, and Sharon Foley. 2005. “The Effect of Peer Evaluations on Student Reports of Learning in a Team Environment: A Procedural Justice Perspective.” Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 7 (1): 4–24. https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.14566.
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system